Jimmy Savile, the television presenter and media personality,
knighted for his charity work for sick and disabled children is to be
exposed as a prolific sexual abuser of girls as young as 12
in a documentary this week.
This news will not come as a shock to many, as the rumours about Savile
have been in the public domain for decades. That's truly shocking part
of this story – so many people either knew or suspected the fact that
Savile was assaulting underage girls but chose to do nothing whatsoever
about it.
A number of Savile's former colleagues interviewed for
the documentary admitted that his predatory behaviour towards young
girls was an open secret at the BBC. Wilfred De'Ath, who worked with
Savile in the 1960s, told of how he spoke to a girl he believed to be 12
years old while she was in bed with the presenter the morning after he
had seen Savile with her at a restaurant, describing her as like a
"little lost soul". De'Ath admitted that it was "common gossip" that
Savile was an abuser. Still, neither he nor any other colleagues
reported him either to the BBC bosses or police.
It is a shame
that the evidence against Savile was not tested when he was alive. In
2007, Surrey police received a complaint from a woman who said she was
sexually assaulted by Savile at an
approved school
that Savile regularly visited in the 1970s, but the Crown Prosecution
Service decided there was insufficient evidence to take it forward.
Esther Rantzen hits the nail on the head in an interview about the revelations when she says, "
in some way we colluded with him as a child abuser"
and that, "We made him into the Jimmy Savile who was untouchable, who
nobody could criticise." But it is not only celebrities who are
protected from justice. Throughout society, there is a culture of
denial, minimisation and disbelief around child sexual abuse. It would
seem that child sexual predators are often better protected than their
victims.
Savile is not the only one in show business about whom rumours were rife before those alleging child sexual abuse came forward.
Jonathan King was sentenced to seven years in prison
in 2001 for the sexual assault of five teenage boys between 1983 and
1989, but after his arrest dozens more came forward and said it had
happened to them too. Apparently it was no secret that King groomed
young boys for sex among those in the music business.
In 1999
Gary Glitter was convicted
on 54 counts of possession of child pornography. At time of his
conviction several of those who used to work or socialise with Glitter
said it was well known that Glitter sought out young girls for sex.
Why
do we so often fail to act when we suspect or even know that children
are being sexually abused? Nothing prompts the question more than the
disgraceful example of the
grooming gangs in Rochdale
in which scores of girls were drugged, raped and sold by men who were
afforded better protection than their victims were until the criminal
justice system and child protection agencies were forced to act. In
2008, one victim of the most serious abuse and exploitation reported to
the police and another agency that she had been the victim of serious
sexual assaults by adult men but the focus was more on her behaviour
than of the abusers.
The testimonies of the women that appear in
the Savile documentary are heartbreaking. One spoke of how she was raped
by Savile, but that she blamed herself because "no one blamed him."
Another was locked in an isolation unit for days at her approved school
when she made allegations about Savile in the 1970s, because she was
assumed to be lying, as are so many abused children both then and now.
"No one believed me then and I don't expect anyone to believe me now."
Unless we start listening to children, in decades to come we will be
hearing the same tragic stories.
Julie Bindel @
'The Guardian'